Bandhan Medium to Long Duration Fund vs CANARA ROBECO INCOME FUND
Medium to Long Duration Fund · Direct Plan – Growth · Compared on official AMFI NAV data · NAVs as of 13-Jul-2026
| Metric | Bandhan Medium to Long Duration Fund | CANARA ROBECO INCOME FUND |
|---|---|---|
| Latest NAV | ₹75.09 | ₹64.7 |
| 1-Year Return | +6.12% | +4.34% |
| 3-Year Return (CAGR) | +6.86% | +6.53% |
| 5-Year Return (CAGR) | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility (1Y, annualised) | 2.4% | 1.8% |
| Max Drawdown | −1.9% | −1.4% |
| Fund House | Bandhan Mutual Fund | Canara Robeco Mutual Fund |
Growth of ₹10,000
If you had invested ₹10,000 in each fund
Embed this chart on your site (free)
Copy this code into your website or blog. It stays up to date automatically.
<iframe src="https://moneydock.in/embed/fund-compare/bandhan-medium-to-long-duration-fund-vs-canara-robeco-income-fund" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;max-width:760px" title="Bandhan Medium to Long Duration Fund vs CANARA ROBECO INCOME FUND by MoneyDock" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p style="font-size:12px">Powered by <a href="https://moneydock.in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MoneyDock</a></p>
See the embed documentation for all widgets, sizing options and usage terms.
Bandhan Medium to Long Duration Fund vs CANARA ROBECO INCOME FUND: which is better?
Bandhan Medium to Long Duration Fund and CANARA ROBECO INCOME FUND are both medium to long duration fund mutual funds (direct plan, growth option). This comparison uses each fund's official AMFI NAV history — the same daily data the fund houses publish — to compare returns, volatility and drawdowns side by side.
On 3-year returns (annualised), Bandhan Medium to Long Duration Fund leads with +6.86% against +6.53% — a gap of about 0.34 percentage points per year over that period.
CANARA ROBECO INCOME FUND has been the steadier fund over the past year, with annualised volatility of 1.8% versus 2.4%. Looking at worst falls, Bandhan Medium to Long Duration Fund's deepest drawdown in the stored history is −1.9% against −1.4% for CANARA ROBECO INCOME FUND.
Which fund suits you depends on your horizon and appetite for swings: the higher-return fund is only the better pick if you can hold through its rougher months. Use the ₹10,000 growth chart above to see how each fund actually behaved through market cycles, and consider consulting a SEBI-registered adviser before investing. This comparison is informational, not investment advice.
Key takeaways
- Bandhan Medium to Long Duration Fund has delivered higher 3-year returns (+6.86% vs +6.53%).
- CANARA ROBECO INCOME FUND has shown lower volatility over the trailing year.
- CANARA ROBECO INCOME FUND has had the shallower maximum drawdown (−1.4%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which fund has given higher returns — Bandhan Medium to Long Duration Fund or CANARA ROBECO INCOME FUND?
Over the past 3 year period, Bandhan Medium to Long Duration Fund has delivered higher returns: +6.86% versus +6.53% annualised. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which fund is less risky — Bandhan Medium to Long Duration Fund or CANARA ROBECO INCOME FUND?
Based on the trailing year, CANARA ROBECO INCOME FUND has shown lower day-to-day volatility (Bandhan Medium to Long Duration Fund: 2.4%, CANARA ROBECO INCOME FUND: 1.8% annualised). Volatility and drawdowns describe past behaviour, not future safety — both funds carry the market risk of their category.
Can I invest in both Bandhan Medium to Long Duration Fund and CANARA ROBECO INCOME FUND?
Yes — many investors split a SIP across two funds. If both funds are from the same category, remember they will hold overlapping stocks, so diversification benefits may be smaller than they appear. Check each scheme's portfolio before doubling up within one category.
More Medium to Long Duration Fund comparisons
Returns, volatility and drawdowns are computed from official AMFI NAV history for direct-growth plans and may differ slightly from fund-house factsheets due to date conventions. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. This comparison is for informational purposes only — not investment advice.