Baroda BNP Paribas Equity Savings Fund vs Edelweiss Equity Savings Fund
Equity Savings · Direct Plan – Growth · Compared on official AMFI NAV data · NAVs as of 13-Jul-2026
| Metric | Baroda BNP Paribas Equity Savings Fund | Edelweiss Equity Savings Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Latest NAV | ₹18.64 | ₹30.06 |
| 1-Year Return | +4.67% | +8.14% |
| 3-Year Return (CAGR) | +10.41% | +12.27% |
| 5-Year Return (CAGR) | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility (1Y, annualised) | 5.5% | 4.1% |
| Max Drawdown | −5.3% | −3.5% |
| Fund House | Baroda BNP Paribas Mutual Fund | Edelweiss Mutual Fund |
Growth of ₹10,000
If you had invested ₹10,000 in each fund
Embed this chart on your site (free)
Copy this code into your website or blog. It stays up to date automatically.
<iframe src="https://moneydock.in/embed/fund-compare/baroda-bnp-paribas-equity-savings-fund-vs-edelweiss-equity-savings-fund" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;max-width:760px" title="Baroda BNP Paribas Equity Savings Fund vs Edelweiss Equity Savings Fund by MoneyDock" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p style="font-size:12px">Powered by <a href="https://moneydock.in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MoneyDock</a></p>
See the embed documentation for all widgets, sizing options and usage terms.
Baroda BNP Paribas Equity Savings Fund vs Edelweiss Equity Savings Fund: which is better?
Baroda BNP Paribas Equity Savings Fund and Edelweiss Equity Savings Fund are both equity savings mutual funds (direct plan, growth option). This comparison uses each fund's official AMFI NAV history — the same daily data the fund houses publish — to compare returns, volatility and drawdowns side by side.
On 3-year returns (annualised), Edelweiss Equity Savings Fund leads with +12.27% against +10.41% — a gap of about 1.87 percentage points per year over that period.
Edelweiss Equity Savings Fund has been the steadier fund over the past year, with annualised volatility of 4.1% versus 5.5%. Looking at worst falls, Baroda BNP Paribas Equity Savings Fund's deepest drawdown in the stored history is −5.3% against −3.5% for Edelweiss Equity Savings Fund.
Which fund suits you depends on your horizon and appetite for swings: the higher-return fund is only the better pick if you can hold through its rougher months. Use the ₹10,000 growth chart above to see how each fund actually behaved through market cycles, and consider consulting a SEBI-registered adviser before investing. This comparison is informational, not investment advice.
Key takeaways
- Edelweiss Equity Savings Fund has delivered higher 3-year returns (+12.27% vs +10.41%).
- Edelweiss Equity Savings Fund has shown lower volatility over the trailing year.
- Edelweiss Equity Savings Fund has had the shallower maximum drawdown (−3.5%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which fund has given higher returns — Baroda BNP Paribas Equity Savings Fund or Edelweiss Equity Savings Fund?
Over the past 3 year period, Edelweiss Equity Savings Fund has delivered higher returns: +12.27% versus +10.41% annualised. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which fund is less risky — Baroda BNP Paribas Equity Savings Fund or Edelweiss Equity Savings Fund?
Based on the trailing year, Edelweiss Equity Savings Fund has shown lower day-to-day volatility (Baroda BNP Paribas Equity Savings Fund: 5.5%, Edelweiss Equity Savings Fund: 4.1% annualised). Volatility and drawdowns describe past behaviour, not future safety — both funds carry the market risk of their category.
Can I invest in both Baroda BNP Paribas Equity Savings Fund and Edelweiss Equity Savings Fund?
Yes — many investors split a SIP across two funds. If both funds are from the same category, remember they will hold overlapping stocks, so diversification benefits may be smaller than they appear. Check each scheme's portfolio before doubling up within one category.
More Equity Savings comparisons
Returns, volatility and drawdowns are computed from official AMFI NAV history for direct-growth plans and may differ slightly from fund-house factsheets due to date conventions. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. This comparison is for informational purposes only — not investment advice.