Canara Robeco Focused Fund vs quant Focused Fund - Growth Option
Focused Fund · Direct Plan – Growth · Compared on official AMFI NAV data · NAVs as of 13-Jul-2026
| Metric | Canara Robeco Focused Fund | quant Focused Fund - Growth Option |
|---|---|---|
| Latest NAV | ₹21.25 | ₹104.78 |
| 1-Year Return | -1.57% | +8.13% |
| 3-Year Return (CAGR) | +15.53% | +17.95% |
| 5-Year Return (CAGR) | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility (1Y, annualised) | 13.6% | 17.3% |
| Max Drawdown | −16.5% | −24.0% |
| Fund House | Canara Robeco Mutual Fund | quant Mutual Fund |
Growth of ₹10,000
If you had invested ₹10,000 in each fund
Embed this chart on your site (free)
Copy this code into your website or blog. It stays up to date automatically.
<iframe src="https://moneydock.in/embed/fund-compare/canara-robeco-focused-fund-vs-quant-focused-fund-growth-option" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;max-width:760px" title="Canara Robeco Focused Fund vs quant Focused Fund - Growth Option by MoneyDock" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p style="font-size:12px">Powered by <a href="https://moneydock.in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MoneyDock</a></p>
See the embed documentation for all widgets, sizing options and usage terms.
Canara Robeco Focused Fund vs quant Focused Fund - Growth Option: which is better?
Canara Robeco Focused Fund and quant Focused Fund - Growth Option are both focused fund mutual funds (direct plan, growth option). This comparison uses each fund's official AMFI NAV history — the same daily data the fund houses publish — to compare returns, volatility and drawdowns side by side.
On 3-year returns (annualised), quant Focused Fund - Growth Option leads with +17.95% against +15.53% — a gap of about 2.42 percentage points per year over that period.
Canara Robeco Focused Fund has been the steadier fund over the past year, with annualised volatility of 13.6% versus 17.3%. Looking at worst falls, Canara Robeco Focused Fund's deepest drawdown in the stored history is −16.5% against −24.0% for quant Focused Fund - Growth Option.
Which fund suits you depends on your horizon and appetite for swings: the higher-return fund is only the better pick if you can hold through its rougher months. Use the ₹10,000 growth chart above to see how each fund actually behaved through market cycles, and consider consulting a SEBI-registered adviser before investing. This comparison is informational, not investment advice.
Key takeaways
- quant Focused Fund - Growth Option has delivered higher 3-year returns (+17.95% vs +15.53%).
- Canara Robeco Focused Fund has shown lower volatility over the trailing year.
- Canara Robeco Focused Fund has had the shallower maximum drawdown (−16.5%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which fund has given higher returns — Canara Robeco Focused Fund or quant Focused Fund - Growth Option?
Over the past 3 year period, quant Focused Fund - Growth Option has delivered higher returns: +17.95% versus +15.53% annualised. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which fund is less risky — Canara Robeco Focused Fund or quant Focused Fund - Growth Option?
Based on the trailing year, Canara Robeco Focused Fund has shown lower day-to-day volatility (Canara Robeco Focused Fund: 13.6%, quant Focused Fund - Growth Option: 17.3% annualised). Volatility and drawdowns describe past behaviour, not future safety — both funds carry the market risk of their category.
Can I invest in both Canara Robeco Focused Fund and quant Focused Fund - Growth Option?
Yes — many investors split a SIP across two funds. If both funds are from the same category, remember they will hold overlapping stocks, so diversification benefits may be smaller than they appear. Check each scheme's portfolio before doubling up within one category.
More Focused Fund comparisons
Returns, volatility and drawdowns are computed from official AMFI NAV history for direct-growth plans and may differ slightly from fund-house factsheets due to date conventions. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. This comparison is for informational purposes only — not investment advice.