Edelweiss Gold and Silver ETF FOF vs UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund
FoF Domestic · Direct Plan – Growth · Compared on official AMFI NAV data · NAVs as of 10-Jul-2026
| Metric | Edelweiss Gold and Silver ETF FOF | UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Latest NAV | ₹32.37 | ₹27.75 |
| 1-Year Return | +71.49% | +100.14% |
| 3-Year Return (CAGR) | +37.69% | +45.57% |
| 5-Year Return (CAGR) | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility (1Y, annualised) | 41.6% | 60.2% |
| Max Drawdown | −34.2% | −45.5% |
| Fund House | Edelweiss Mutual Fund | UTI Mutual Fund |
Growth of ₹10,000
If you had invested ₹10,000 in each fund
Embed this chart on your site (free)
Copy this code into your website or blog. It stays up to date automatically.
<iframe src="https://moneydock.in/embed/fund-compare/edelweiss-gold-and-silver-etf-fof-vs-uti-silver-etf-fund-of-fund" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;max-width:760px" title="Edelweiss Gold and Silver ETF FOF vs UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund by MoneyDock" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p style="font-size:12px">Powered by <a href="https://moneydock.in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MoneyDock</a></p>
See the embed documentation for all widgets, sizing options and usage terms.
Edelweiss Gold and Silver ETF FOF vs UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund: which is better?
Edelweiss Gold and Silver ETF FOF and UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund are both fof domestic mutual funds (direct plan, growth option). This comparison uses each fund's official AMFI NAV history — the same daily data the fund houses publish — to compare returns, volatility and drawdowns side by side.
On 3-year returns (annualised), UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund leads with +45.57% against +37.69% — a gap of about 7.88 percentage points per year over that period.
Edelweiss Gold and Silver ETF FOF has been the steadier fund over the past year, with annualised volatility of 41.6% versus 60.2%. Looking at worst falls, Edelweiss Gold and Silver ETF FOF's deepest drawdown in the stored history is −34.2% against −45.5% for UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund.
Which fund suits you depends on your horizon and appetite for swings: the higher-return fund is only the better pick if you can hold through its rougher months. Use the ₹10,000 growth chart above to see how each fund actually behaved through market cycles, and consider consulting a SEBI-registered adviser before investing. This comparison is informational, not investment advice.
Key takeaways
- UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund has delivered higher 3-year returns (+45.57% vs +37.69%).
- Edelweiss Gold and Silver ETF FOF has shown lower volatility over the trailing year.
- Edelweiss Gold and Silver ETF FOF has had the shallower maximum drawdown (−34.2%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which fund has given higher returns — Edelweiss Gold and Silver ETF FOF or UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund?
Over the past 3 year period, UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund has delivered higher returns: +45.57% versus +37.69% annualised. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which fund is less risky — Edelweiss Gold and Silver ETF FOF or UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund?
Based on the trailing year, Edelweiss Gold and Silver ETF FOF has shown lower day-to-day volatility (Edelweiss Gold and Silver ETF FOF: 41.6%, UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund: 60.2% annualised). Volatility and drawdowns describe past behaviour, not future safety — both funds carry the market risk of their category.
Can I invest in both Edelweiss Gold and Silver ETF FOF and UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund?
Yes — many investors split a SIP across two funds. If both funds are from the same category, remember they will hold overlapping stocks, so diversification benefits may be smaller than they appear. Check each scheme's portfolio before doubling up within one category.
More FoF Domestic comparisons
Returns, volatility and drawdowns are computed from official AMFI NAV history for direct-growth plans and may differ slightly from fund-house factsheets due to date conventions. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. This comparison is for informational purposes only — not investment advice.