ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund vs Mirae Asset Dynamic Term Fund
Dynamic Term Fund · Direct Plan – Growth · Compared on official AMFI NAV data · NAVs as of 30-Oct-2026
| Metric | ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund | Mirae Asset Dynamic Term Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Latest NAV | ₹42.18 | ₹18.53 |
| 1-Year Return | +4.38% | +3.28% |
| 3-Year Return (CAGR) | +7.43% | +6.57% |
| 5-Year Return (CAGR) | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility (1Y, annualised) | 2.3% | 1.5% |
| Max Drawdown | −1.8% | −2.5% |
| Fund House | ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund | Mirae Asset Mutual Fund |
Growth of ₹10,000
If you had invested ₹10,000 in each fund
Embed this chart on your site (free)
Copy this code into your website or blog. It stays up to date automatically.
<iframe src="https://moneydock.in/embed/fund-compare/icici-prudential-all-seasons-bond-fund-vs-mirae-asset-dynamic-bond-fund" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;max-width:760px" title="ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund vs Mirae Asset Dynamic Term Fund by MoneyDock" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p style="font-size:12px">Powered by <a href="https://moneydock.in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MoneyDock</a></p>
See the embed documentation for all widgets, sizing options and usage terms.
ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund vs Mirae Asset Dynamic Term Fund: which is better?
ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund and Mirae Asset Dynamic Term Fund are both dynamic term fund mutual funds (direct plan, growth option). This comparison uses each fund's official AMFI NAV history — the same daily data the fund houses publish — to compare returns, volatility and drawdowns side by side.
On 3-year returns (annualised), ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund leads with +7.43% against +6.57% — a gap of about 0.86 percentage points per year over that period.
Mirae Asset Dynamic Term Fund has been the steadier fund over the past year, with annualised volatility of 1.5% versus 2.3%. Looking at worst falls, ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund's deepest drawdown in the stored history is −1.8% against −2.5% for Mirae Asset Dynamic Term Fund.
Which fund suits you depends on your horizon and appetite for swings: the higher-return fund is only the better pick if you can hold through its rougher months. Use the ₹10,000 growth chart above to see how each fund actually behaved through market cycles, and consider consulting a SEBI-registered adviser before investing. This comparison is informational, not investment advice.
Key takeaways
- ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund has delivered higher 3-year returns (+7.43% vs +6.57%).
- Mirae Asset Dynamic Term Fund has shown lower volatility over the trailing year.
- ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund has had the shallower maximum drawdown (−1.8%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which fund has given higher returns — ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund or Mirae Asset Dynamic Term Fund?
Over the past 3 year period, ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund has delivered higher returns: +7.43% versus +6.57% annualised. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which fund is less risky — ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund or Mirae Asset Dynamic Term Fund?
Based on the trailing year, Mirae Asset Dynamic Term Fund has shown lower day-to-day volatility (ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund: 2.3%, Mirae Asset Dynamic Term Fund: 1.5% annualised). Volatility and drawdowns describe past behaviour, not future safety — both funds carry the market risk of their category.
Can I invest in both ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund and Mirae Asset Dynamic Term Fund?
Yes — many investors split a SIP across two funds. If both funds are from the same category, remember they will hold overlapping stocks, so diversification benefits may be smaller than they appear. Check each scheme's portfolio before doubling up within one category.
More Dynamic Term Fund comparisons
Returns, volatility and drawdowns are computed from official AMFI NAV history for direct-growth plans and may differ slightly from fund-house factsheets due to date conventions. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. This comparison is for informational purposes only — not investment advice.