Invesco India PSU Equity Fund vs Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund
Thematic Fund · Direct Plan – Growth · Compared on official AMFI NAV data · NAVs as of 31-Jul-2026
| Metric | Invesco India PSU Equity Fund | Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Latest NAV | ₹77.98 | ₹113.8 |
| 1-Year Return | -0.37% | +2.84% |
| 3-Year Return (CAGR) | +23.99% | +13.30% |
| 5-Year Return (CAGR) | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility (1Y, annualised) | 17.5% | 14.9% |
| Max Drawdown | −29.8% | −23.5% |
| Fund House | Invesco Mutual Fund | Mirae Asset Mutual Fund |
Growth of ₹10,000
If you had invested ₹10,000 in each fund
Embed this chart on your site (free)
Copy this code into your website or blog. It stays up to date automatically.
<iframe src="https://moneydock.in/embed/fund-compare/invesco-india-psu-equity-fund-vs-mirae-asset-great-consumer-fund" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;max-width:760px" title="Invesco India PSU Equity Fund vs Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund by MoneyDock" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p style="font-size:12px">Powered by <a href="https://moneydock.in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MoneyDock</a></p>
See the embed documentation for all widgets, sizing options and usage terms.
Invesco India PSU Equity Fund vs Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund: which is better?
Invesco India PSU Equity Fund and Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund are both thematic fund mutual funds (direct plan, growth option). This comparison uses each fund's official AMFI NAV history — the same daily data the fund houses publish — to compare returns, volatility and drawdowns side by side.
On 3-year returns (annualised), Invesco India PSU Equity Fund leads with +23.99% against +13.30% — a gap of about 10.70 percentage points per year over that period.
Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund has been the steadier fund over the past year, with annualised volatility of 14.9% versus 17.5%. Looking at worst falls, Invesco India PSU Equity Fund's deepest drawdown in the stored history is −29.8% against −23.5% for Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund.
Which fund suits you depends on your horizon and appetite for swings: the higher-return fund is only the better pick if you can hold through its rougher months. Use the ₹10,000 growth chart above to see how each fund actually behaved through market cycles, and consider consulting a SEBI-registered adviser before investing. This comparison is informational, not investment advice.
Key takeaways
- Invesco India PSU Equity Fund has delivered higher 3-year returns (+23.99% vs +13.30%).
- Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund has shown lower volatility over the trailing year.
- Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund has had the shallower maximum drawdown (−23.5%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which fund has given higher returns — Invesco India PSU Equity Fund or Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund?
Over the past 3 year period, Invesco India PSU Equity Fund has delivered higher returns: +23.99% versus +13.30% annualised. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which fund is less risky — Invesco India PSU Equity Fund or Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund?
Based on the trailing year, Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund has shown lower day-to-day volatility (Invesco India PSU Equity Fund: 17.5%, Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund: 14.9% annualised). Volatility and drawdowns describe past behaviour, not future safety — both funds carry the market risk of their category.
Can I invest in both Invesco India PSU Equity Fund and Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund?
Yes — many investors split a SIP across two funds. If both funds are from the same category, remember they will hold overlapping stocks, so diversification benefits may be smaller than they appear. Check each scheme's portfolio before doubling up within one category.
More Thematic Fund comparisons
Returns, volatility and drawdowns are computed from official AMFI NAV history for direct-growth plans and may differ slightly from fund-house factsheets due to date conventions. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. This comparison is for informational purposes only — not investment advice.