MoneyDock

Invesco India Ultra Short Duration Fund vs Nippon India Ultra Short Duration Fund

Ultra Short Duration Fund · Direct Plan – Growth · Compared on official AMFI NAV data · NAVs as of 13-Jul-2026

MetricInvesco India Ultra Short Duration FundNippon India Ultra Short Duration Fund
Latest NAV₹3,078.22₹4,764.24
1-Year Return+6.94%+7.25%
3-Year Return (CAGR)+7.60%+7.86%
5-Year Return (CAGR)N/AN/A
Volatility (1Y, annualised)0.5%0.5%
Max Drawdown−0.1%−0.1%
Fund HouseInvesco Mutual FundNippon India Mutual Fund

Growth of ₹10,000

If you had invested ₹10,000 in each fund

Embed this chart on your site (free)

Copy this code into your website or blog. It stays up to date automatically.

<iframe src="https://moneydock.in/embed/fund-compare/invesco-india-ultra-short-duration-fund-vs-nippon-india-ultra-short-duration-fund" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;max-width:760px" title="Invesco India Ultra Short Duration Fund vs Nippon India Ultra Short Duration Fund by MoneyDock" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:12px">Powered by <a href="https://moneydock.in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MoneyDock</a></p>

See the embed documentation for all widgets, sizing options and usage terms.

Invesco India Ultra Short Duration Fund vs Nippon India Ultra Short Duration Fund: which is better?

Invesco India Ultra Short Duration Fund and Nippon India Ultra Short Duration Fund are both ultra short duration fund mutual funds (direct plan, growth option). This comparison uses each fund's official AMFI NAV history — the same daily data the fund houses publish — to compare returns, volatility and drawdowns side by side.

On 3-year returns (annualised), Nippon India Ultra Short Duration Fund leads with +7.86% against +7.60% — a gap of about 0.26 percentage points per year over that period.

Invesco India Ultra Short Duration Fund has been the steadier fund over the past year, with annualised volatility of 0.5% versus 0.5%. Looking at worst falls, Invesco India Ultra Short Duration Fund's deepest drawdown in the stored history is −0.1% against −0.1% for Nippon India Ultra Short Duration Fund.

Which fund suits you depends on your horizon and appetite for swings: the higher-return fund is only the better pick if you can hold through its rougher months. Use the ₹10,000 growth chart above to see how each fund actually behaved through market cycles, and consider consulting a SEBI-registered adviser before investing. This comparison is informational, not investment advice.

Key takeaways

  • Nippon India Ultra Short Duration Fund has delivered higher 3-year returns (+7.86% vs +7.60%).
  • Invesco India Ultra Short Duration Fund has shown lower volatility over the trailing year.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which fund has given higher returns — Invesco India Ultra Short Duration Fund or Nippon India Ultra Short Duration Fund?

Over the past 3 year period, Nippon India Ultra Short Duration Fund has delivered higher returns: +7.86% versus +7.60% annualised. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which fund is less risky — Invesco India Ultra Short Duration Fund or Nippon India Ultra Short Duration Fund?

Based on the trailing year, Invesco India Ultra Short Duration Fund has shown lower day-to-day volatility (Invesco India Ultra Short Duration Fund: 0.5%, Nippon India Ultra Short Duration Fund: 0.5% annualised). Volatility and drawdowns describe past behaviour, not future safety — both funds carry the market risk of their category.

Can I invest in both Invesco India Ultra Short Duration Fund and Nippon India Ultra Short Duration Fund?

Yes — many investors split a SIP across two funds. If both funds are from the same category, remember they will hold overlapping stocks, so diversification benefits may be smaller than they appear. Check each scheme's portfolio before doubling up within one category.

Returns, volatility and drawdowns are computed from official AMFI NAV history for direct-growth plans and may differ slightly from fund-house factsheets due to date conventions. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. This comparison is for informational purposes only — not investment advice.