LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund vs PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund
Aggressive Hybrid Fund · Direct Plan – Growth · Compared on official AMFI NAV data · NAVs as of 14-Aug-2026
| Metric | LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund | PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Latest NAV | ₹234.43 | ₹158.43 |
| 1-Year Return | +3.81% | +0.00% |
| 3-Year Return (CAGR) | +12.42% | +10.43% |
| 5-Year Return (CAGR) | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility (1Y, annualised) | 11.3% | 9.7% |
| Max Drawdown | −15.1% | −12.7% |
| Fund House | LIC Mutual Fund | PGIM India Mutual Fund |
Growth of ₹10,000
If you had invested ₹10,000 in each fund
Embed this chart on your site (free)
Copy this code into your website or blog. It stays up to date automatically.
<iframe src="https://moneydock.in/embed/fund-compare/lic-mf-aggressive-hybrid-fund-vs-pgim-india-aggressive-hybrid-equity-fund" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;max-width:760px" title="LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund vs PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund by MoneyDock" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p style="font-size:12px">Powered by <a href="https://moneydock.in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MoneyDock</a></p>
See the embed documentation for all widgets, sizing options and usage terms.
LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund vs PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund: which is better?
LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund and PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund are both aggressive hybrid fund mutual funds (direct plan, growth option). This comparison uses each fund's official AMFI NAV history — the same daily data the fund houses publish — to compare returns, volatility and drawdowns side by side.
On 3-year returns (annualised), LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund leads with +12.42% against +10.43% — a gap of about 1.99 percentage points per year over that period.
PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund has been the steadier fund over the past year, with annualised volatility of 9.7% versus 11.3%. Looking at worst falls, LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund's deepest drawdown in the stored history is −15.1% against −12.7% for PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund.
Which fund suits you depends on your horizon and appetite for swings: the higher-return fund is only the better pick if you can hold through its rougher months. Use the ₹10,000 growth chart above to see how each fund actually behaved through market cycles, and consider consulting a SEBI-registered adviser before investing. This comparison is informational, not investment advice.
Key takeaways
- LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund has delivered higher 3-year returns (+12.42% vs +10.43%).
- PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund has shown lower volatility over the trailing year.
- PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund has had the shallower maximum drawdown (−12.7%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which fund has given higher returns — LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund or PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund?
Over the past 3 year period, LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund has delivered higher returns: +12.42% versus +10.43% annualised. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which fund is less risky — LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund or PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund?
Based on the trailing year, PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund has shown lower day-to-day volatility (LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund: 11.3%, PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund: 9.7% annualised). Volatility and drawdowns describe past behaviour, not future safety — both funds carry the market risk of their category.
Can I invest in both LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund and PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund?
Yes — many investors split a SIP across two funds. If both funds are from the same category, remember they will hold overlapping stocks, so diversification benefits may be smaller than they appear. Check each scheme's portfolio before doubling up within one category.
More Aggressive Hybrid Fund comparisons
Returns, volatility and drawdowns are computed from official AMFI NAV history for direct-growth plans and may differ slightly from fund-house factsheets due to date conventions. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. This comparison is for informational purposes only — not investment advice.