LIC MF Short Duration Fund vs UTI Short Duration Fund
Short Duration Fund · Direct Plan – Growth · Compared on official AMFI NAV data · NAVs as of 13-Jul-2026
| Metric | LIC MF Short Duration Fund | UTI Short Duration Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Latest NAV | ₹16.58 | ₹35.87 |
| 1-Year Return | +6.23% | +5.97% |
| 3-Year Return (CAGR) | +7.86% | +7.76% |
| 5-Year Return (CAGR) | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility (1Y, annualised) | 1.3% | 1.1% |
| Max Drawdown | −0.8% | −0.5% |
| Fund House | LIC Mutual Fund | UTI Mutual Fund |
Growth of ₹10,000
If you had invested ₹10,000 in each fund
Embed this chart on your site (free)
Copy this code into your website or blog. It stays up to date automatically.
<iframe src="https://moneydock.in/embed/fund-compare/lic-mf-short-duration-fund-vs-uti-short-duration-fund" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;max-width:760px" title="LIC MF Short Duration Fund vs UTI Short Duration Fund by MoneyDock" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p style="font-size:12px">Powered by <a href="https://moneydock.in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MoneyDock</a></p>
See the embed documentation for all widgets, sizing options and usage terms.
LIC MF Short Duration Fund vs UTI Short Duration Fund: which is better?
LIC MF Short Duration Fund and UTI Short Duration Fund are both short duration fund mutual funds (direct plan, growth option). This comparison uses each fund's official AMFI NAV history — the same daily data the fund houses publish — to compare returns, volatility and drawdowns side by side.
On 3-year returns (annualised), LIC MF Short Duration Fund leads with +7.86% against +7.76% — a gap of about 0.10 percentage points per year over that period.
UTI Short Duration Fund has been the steadier fund over the past year, with annualised volatility of 1.1% versus 1.3%. Looking at worst falls, LIC MF Short Duration Fund's deepest drawdown in the stored history is −0.8% against −0.5% for UTI Short Duration Fund.
Which fund suits you depends on your horizon and appetite for swings: the higher-return fund is only the better pick if you can hold through its rougher months. Use the ₹10,000 growth chart above to see how each fund actually behaved through market cycles, and consider consulting a SEBI-registered adviser before investing. This comparison is informational, not investment advice.
Key takeaways
- LIC MF Short Duration Fund has delivered higher 3-year returns (+7.86% vs +7.76%).
- UTI Short Duration Fund has shown lower volatility over the trailing year.
- UTI Short Duration Fund has had the shallower maximum drawdown (−0.5%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which fund has given higher returns — LIC MF Short Duration Fund or UTI Short Duration Fund?
Over the past 3 year period, LIC MF Short Duration Fund has delivered higher returns: +7.86% versus +7.76% annualised. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which fund is less risky — LIC MF Short Duration Fund or UTI Short Duration Fund?
Based on the trailing year, UTI Short Duration Fund has shown lower day-to-day volatility (LIC MF Short Duration Fund: 1.3%, UTI Short Duration Fund: 1.1% annualised). Volatility and drawdowns describe past behaviour, not future safety — both funds carry the market risk of their category.
Can I invest in both LIC MF Short Duration Fund and UTI Short Duration Fund?
Yes — many investors split a SIP across two funds. If both funds are from the same category, remember they will hold overlapping stocks, so diversification benefits may be smaller than they appear. Check each scheme's portfolio before doubling up within one category.
More Short Duration Fund comparisons
Returns, volatility and drawdowns are computed from official AMFI NAV history for direct-growth plans and may differ slightly from fund-house factsheets due to date conventions. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. This comparison is for informational purposes only — not investment advice.