MoneyDock

Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund vs UTI - Transportation and Logistics Fund

Thematic Fund · Direct Plan – Growth · Compared on official AMFI NAV data · NAVs as of 09-Nov-2026

MetricMirae Asset Great Consumer FundUTI - Transportation and Logistics Fund
Latest NAV₹114.53₹348.53
1-Year Return+0.05%+3.65%
3-Year Return (CAGR)+12.18%+19.71%
5-Year Return (CAGR)N/AN/A
Volatility (1Y, annualised)16.0%18.7%
Max Drawdown−23.5%−24.9%
Fund HouseMirae Asset Mutual FundUTI Mutual Fund

Growth of ₹10,000

If you had invested ₹10,000 in each fund

Embed this chart on your site (free)

Copy this code into your website or blog. It stays up to date automatically.

<iframe src="https://moneydock.in/embed/fund-compare/mirae-asset-great-consumer-fund-vs-uti-transportation-and-logistics-fund-growth-option" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;max-width:760px" title="Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund vs UTI - Transportation and Logistics Fund by MoneyDock" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:12px">Powered by <a href="https://moneydock.in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MoneyDock</a></p>

See the embed documentation for all widgets, sizing options and usage terms.

Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund vs UTI - Transportation and Logistics Fund: which is better?

Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund and UTI - Transportation and Logistics Fund are both thematic fund mutual funds (direct plan, growth option). This comparison uses each fund's official AMFI NAV history — the same daily data the fund houses publish — to compare returns, volatility and drawdowns side by side.

On 3-year returns (annualised), UTI - Transportation and Logistics Fund leads with +19.71% against +12.18% — a gap of about 7.53 percentage points per year over that period.

Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund has been the steadier fund over the past year, with annualised volatility of 16.0% versus 18.7%. Looking at worst falls, Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund's deepest drawdown in the stored history is −23.5% against −24.9% for UTI - Transportation and Logistics Fund.

Which fund suits you depends on your horizon and appetite for swings: the higher-return fund is only the better pick if you can hold through its rougher months. Use the ₹10,000 growth chart above to see how each fund actually behaved through market cycles, and consider consulting a SEBI-registered adviser before investing. This comparison is informational, not investment advice.

Key takeaways

  • UTI - Transportation and Logistics Fund has delivered higher 3-year returns (+19.71% vs +12.18%).
  • Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund has shown lower volatility over the trailing year.
  • Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund has had the shallower maximum drawdown (−23.5%).

Frequently Asked Questions

Which fund has given higher returns — Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund or UTI - Transportation and Logistics Fund?

Over the past 3 year period, UTI - Transportation and Logistics Fund has delivered higher returns: +19.71% versus +12.18% annualised. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which fund is less risky — Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund or UTI - Transportation and Logistics Fund?

Based on the trailing year, Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund has shown lower day-to-day volatility (Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund: 16.0%, UTI - Transportation and Logistics Fund: 18.7% annualised). Volatility and drawdowns describe past behaviour, not future safety — both funds carry the market risk of their category.

Can I invest in both Mirae Asset Great Consumer Fund and UTI - Transportation and Logistics Fund?

Yes — many investors split a SIP across two funds. If both funds are from the same category, remember they will hold overlapping stocks, so diversification benefits may be smaller than they appear. Check each scheme's portfolio before doubling up within one category.

Returns, volatility and drawdowns are computed from official AMFI NAV history for direct-growth plans and may differ slightly from fund-house factsheets due to date conventions. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. This comparison is for informational purposes only — not investment advice.