SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan vs UTI Children's Equity Fund
Children’s Fund · Direct Plan – Growth · Compared on official AMFI NAV data · NAVs as of 10-Jul-2026
| Metric | SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan | UTI Children's Equity Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Latest NAV | ₹53.42 | ₹91.57 |
| 1-Year Return | +16.84% | -4.11% |
| 3-Year Return (CAGR) | +22.71% | +11.21% |
| 5-Year Return (CAGR) | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility (1Y, annualised) | 12.3% | 12.6% |
| Max Drawdown | −15.7% | −18.7% |
| Fund House | SBI Mutual Fund | UTI Mutual Fund |
Growth of ₹10,000
If you had invested ₹10,000 in each fund
Embed this chart on your site (free)
Copy this code into your website or blog. It stays up to date automatically.
<iframe src="https://moneydock.in/embed/fund-compare/sbi-children-s-fund-investment-plan-vs-uti-children-s-equity-fund" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;max-width:760px" title="SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan vs UTI Children's Equity Fund by MoneyDock" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p style="font-size:12px">Powered by <a href="https://moneydock.in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MoneyDock</a></p>
See the embed documentation for all widgets, sizing options and usage terms.
SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan vs UTI Children's Equity Fund: which is better?
SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan and UTI Children's Equity Fund are both children’s fund mutual funds (direct plan, growth option). This comparison uses each fund's official AMFI NAV history — the same daily data the fund houses publish — to compare returns, volatility and drawdowns side by side.
On 3-year returns (annualised), SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan leads with +22.71% against +11.21% — a gap of about 11.51 percentage points per year over that period.
SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan has been the steadier fund over the past year, with annualised volatility of 12.3% versus 12.6%. Looking at worst falls, SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan's deepest drawdown in the stored history is −15.7% against −18.7% for UTI Children's Equity Fund.
Which fund suits you depends on your horizon and appetite for swings: the higher-return fund is only the better pick if you can hold through its rougher months. Use the ₹10,000 growth chart above to see how each fund actually behaved through market cycles, and consider consulting a SEBI-registered adviser before investing. This comparison is informational, not investment advice.
Key takeaways
- SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan has delivered higher 3-year returns (+22.71% vs +11.21%).
- SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan has shown lower volatility over the trailing year.
- SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan has had the shallower maximum drawdown (−15.7%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which fund has given higher returns — SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan or UTI Children's Equity Fund?
Over the past 3 year period, SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan has delivered higher returns: +22.71% versus +11.21% annualised. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which fund is less risky — SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan or UTI Children's Equity Fund?
Based on the trailing year, SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan has shown lower day-to-day volatility (SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan: 12.3%, UTI Children's Equity Fund: 12.6% annualised). Volatility and drawdowns describe past behaviour, not future safety — both funds carry the market risk of their category.
Can I invest in both SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan and UTI Children's Equity Fund?
Yes — many investors split a SIP across two funds. If both funds are from the same category, remember they will hold overlapping stocks, so diversification benefits may be smaller than they appear. Check each scheme's portfolio before doubling up within one category.
More Children’s Fund comparisons
Returns, volatility and drawdowns are computed from official AMFI NAV history for direct-growth plans and may differ slightly from fund-house factsheets due to date conventions. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. This comparison is for informational purposes only — not investment advice.