SBI US Specific Equity Active FOF vs Sundaram Global Brand Theme-Equity Active FOF
FoF Overseas · Direct Plan – Growth · Compared on official AMFI NAV data · NAVs as of 30-Oct-2026
| Metric | SBI US Specific Equity Active FOF | Sundaram Global Brand Theme-Equity Active FOF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest NAV | ₹24.5 | ₹47.68 |
| 1-Year Return | +23.50% | +23.18% |
| 3-Year Return (CAGR) | +26.51% | +19.56% |
| 5-Year Return (CAGR) | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility (1Y, annualised) | 17.9% | 14.1% |
| Max Drawdown | −21.8% | −17.7% |
| Fund House | SBI Mutual Fund | Sundaram Mutual Fund |
Growth of ₹10,000
If you had invested ₹10,000 in each fund
Embed this chart on your site (free)
Copy this code into your website or blog. It stays up to date automatically.
<iframe src="https://moneydock.in/embed/fund-compare/sbi-us-specific-equity-active-fof-vs-sundaram-global-brand-theme-equity-active-fof" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;max-width:760px" title="SBI US Specific Equity Active FOF vs Sundaram Global Brand Theme-Equity Active FOF by MoneyDock" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p style="font-size:12px">Powered by <a href="https://moneydock.in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MoneyDock</a></p>
See the embed documentation for all widgets, sizing options and usage terms.
SBI US Specific Equity Active FOF vs Sundaram Global Brand Theme-Equity Active FOF: which is better?
SBI US Specific Equity Active FOF and Sundaram Global Brand Theme-Equity Active FOF are both fof overseas mutual funds (direct plan, growth option). This comparison uses each fund's official AMFI NAV history — the same daily data the fund houses publish — to compare returns, volatility and drawdowns side by side.
On 3-year returns (annualised), SBI US Specific Equity Active FOF leads with +26.51% against +19.56% — a gap of about 6.95 percentage points per year over that period.
Sundaram Global Brand Theme-Equity Active FOF has been the steadier fund over the past year, with annualised volatility of 14.1% versus 17.9%. Looking at worst falls, SBI US Specific Equity Active FOF's deepest drawdown in the stored history is −21.8% against −17.7% for Sundaram Global Brand Theme-Equity Active FOF.
Which fund suits you depends on your horizon and appetite for swings: the higher-return fund is only the better pick if you can hold through its rougher months. Use the ₹10,000 growth chart above to see how each fund actually behaved through market cycles, and consider consulting a SEBI-registered adviser before investing. This comparison is informational, not investment advice.
Key takeaways
- SBI US Specific Equity Active FOF has delivered higher 3-year returns (+26.51% vs +19.56%).
- Sundaram Global Brand Theme-Equity Active FOF has shown lower volatility over the trailing year.
- Sundaram Global Brand Theme-Equity Active FOF has had the shallower maximum drawdown (−17.7%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which fund has given higher returns — SBI US Specific Equity Active FOF or Sundaram Global Brand Theme-Equity Active FOF?
Over the past 3 year period, SBI US Specific Equity Active FOF has delivered higher returns: +26.51% versus +19.56% annualised. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which fund is less risky — SBI US Specific Equity Active FOF or Sundaram Global Brand Theme-Equity Active FOF?
Based on the trailing year, Sundaram Global Brand Theme-Equity Active FOF has shown lower day-to-day volatility (SBI US Specific Equity Active FOF: 17.9%, Sundaram Global Brand Theme-Equity Active FOF: 14.1% annualised). Volatility and drawdowns describe past behaviour, not future safety — both funds carry the market risk of their category.
Can I invest in both SBI US Specific Equity Active FOF and Sundaram Global Brand Theme-Equity Active FOF?
Yes — many investors split a SIP across two funds. If both funds are from the same category, remember they will hold overlapping stocks, so diversification benefits may be smaller than they appear. Check each scheme's portfolio before doubling up within one category.
More FoF Overseas comparisons
Returns, volatility and drawdowns are computed from official AMFI NAV history for direct-growth plans and may differ slightly from fund-house factsheets due to date conventions. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. This comparison is for informational purposes only — not investment advice.