Tata Treasury Advantage Fund vs UTI Low Duration Fund
Low Duration Fund · Direct Plan – Growth · Compared on official AMFI NAV data · NAVs as of 13-Jul-2026
| Metric | Tata Treasury Advantage Fund | UTI Low Duration Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Latest NAV | ₹4,317.74 | ₹3,846.16 |
| 1-Year Return | +6.67% | +6.58% |
| 3-Year Return (CAGR) | +7.57% | +7.54% |
| 5-Year Return (CAGR) | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility (1Y, annualised) | 0.6% | 0.6% |
| Max Drawdown | −0.2% | −0.2% |
| Fund House | Tata Mutual Fund | UTI Mutual Fund |
Growth of ₹10,000
If you had invested ₹10,000 in each fund
Embed this chart on your site (free)
Copy this code into your website or blog. It stays up to date automatically.
<iframe src="https://moneydock.in/embed/fund-compare/tata-treasury-advantage-fund-vs-uti-low-duration-fund" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;max-width:760px" title="Tata Treasury Advantage Fund vs UTI Low Duration Fund by MoneyDock" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p style="font-size:12px">Powered by <a href="https://moneydock.in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MoneyDock</a></p>
See the embed documentation for all widgets, sizing options and usage terms.
Tata Treasury Advantage Fund vs UTI Low Duration Fund: which is better?
Tata Treasury Advantage Fund and UTI Low Duration Fund are both low duration fund mutual funds (direct plan, growth option). This comparison uses each fund's official AMFI NAV history — the same daily data the fund houses publish — to compare returns, volatility and drawdowns side by side.
On 3-year returns (annualised), Tata Treasury Advantage Fund leads with +7.57% against +7.54% — a gap of about 0.03 percentage points per year over that period.
Both funds have shown similar volatility over the past year (about 0.6%). Looking at worst falls, Tata Treasury Advantage Fund's deepest drawdown in the stored history is −0.2% against −0.2% for UTI Low Duration Fund.
Which fund suits you depends on your horizon and appetite for swings: the higher-return fund is only the better pick if you can hold through its rougher months. Use the ₹10,000 growth chart above to see how each fund actually behaved through market cycles, and consider consulting a SEBI-registered adviser before investing. This comparison is informational, not investment advice.
Key takeaways
- Tata Treasury Advantage Fund has delivered higher 3-year returns (+7.57% vs +7.54%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which fund has given higher returns — Tata Treasury Advantage Fund or UTI Low Duration Fund?
Over the past 3 year period, Tata Treasury Advantage Fund has delivered higher returns: +7.57% versus +7.54% annualised. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which fund is less risky — Tata Treasury Advantage Fund or UTI Low Duration Fund?
Based on the trailing year, neither fund clearly separates on volatility (Tata Treasury Advantage Fund: 0.6%, UTI Low Duration Fund: 0.6% annualised). Volatility and drawdowns describe past behaviour, not future safety — both funds carry the market risk of their category.
Can I invest in both Tata Treasury Advantage Fund and UTI Low Duration Fund?
Yes — many investors split a SIP across two funds. If both funds are from the same category, remember they will hold overlapping stocks, so diversification benefits may be smaller than they appear. Check each scheme's portfolio before doubling up within one category.
More Low Duration Fund comparisons
Returns, volatility and drawdowns are computed from official AMFI NAV history for direct-growth plans and may differ slightly from fund-house factsheets due to date conventions. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. This comparison is for informational purposes only — not investment advice.