MoneyDock

Aditya Birla Sun Life Credit Risk Fund vs Nippon India Credit Risk Fund

Credit Risk Fund · Direct Plan – Growth · Compared on official AMFI NAV data · NAVs as of 13-Jul-2026

MetricAditya Birla Sun Life Credit Risk FundNippon India Credit Risk Fund
Latest NAV₹27.84₹41.9
1-Year Return+13.78%+8.75%
3-Year Return (CAGR)+13.37%+9.31%
5-Year Return (CAGR)N/AN/A
Volatility (1Y, annualised)3.6%1.0%
Max Drawdown−0.4%−0.4%
Fund HouseAditya Birla Sun Life Mutual FundNippon India Mutual Fund

Growth of ₹10,000

If you had invested ₹10,000 in each fund

Embed this chart on your site (free)

Copy this code into your website or blog. It stays up to date automatically.

<iframe src="https://moneydock.in/embed/fund-compare/aditya-birla-sun-life-credit-risk-fund-vs-nippon-india-credit-risk-fund" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;max-width:760px" title="Aditya Birla Sun Life Credit Risk Fund vs Nippon India Credit Risk Fund by MoneyDock" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:12px">Powered by <a href="https://moneydock.in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MoneyDock</a></p>

See the embed documentation for all widgets, sizing options and usage terms.

Aditya Birla Sun Life Credit Risk Fund vs Nippon India Credit Risk Fund: which is better?

Aditya Birla Sun Life Credit Risk Fund and Nippon India Credit Risk Fund are both credit risk fund mutual funds (direct plan, growth option). This comparison uses each fund's official AMFI NAV history — the same daily data the fund houses publish — to compare returns, volatility and drawdowns side by side.

On 3-year returns (annualised), Aditya Birla Sun Life Credit Risk Fund leads with +13.37% against +9.31% — a gap of about 4.06 percentage points per year over that period.

Nippon India Credit Risk Fund has been the steadier fund over the past year, with annualised volatility of 1.0% versus 3.6%. Looking at worst falls, Aditya Birla Sun Life Credit Risk Fund's deepest drawdown in the stored history is −0.4% against −0.4% for Nippon India Credit Risk Fund.

Which fund suits you depends on your horizon and appetite for swings: the higher-return fund is only the better pick if you can hold through its rougher months. Use the ₹10,000 growth chart above to see how each fund actually behaved through market cycles, and consider consulting a SEBI-registered adviser before investing. This comparison is informational, not investment advice.

Key takeaways

  • Aditya Birla Sun Life Credit Risk Fund has delivered higher 3-year returns (+13.37% vs +9.31%).
  • Nippon India Credit Risk Fund has shown lower volatility over the trailing year.
  • Nippon India Credit Risk Fund has had the shallower maximum drawdown (−0.4%).

Frequently Asked Questions

Which fund has given higher returns — Aditya Birla Sun Life Credit Risk Fund or Nippon India Credit Risk Fund?

Over the past 3 year period, Aditya Birla Sun Life Credit Risk Fund has delivered higher returns: +13.37% versus +9.31% annualised. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which fund is less risky — Aditya Birla Sun Life Credit Risk Fund or Nippon India Credit Risk Fund?

Based on the trailing year, Nippon India Credit Risk Fund has shown lower day-to-day volatility (Aditya Birla Sun Life Credit Risk Fund: 3.6%, Nippon India Credit Risk Fund: 1.0% annualised). Volatility and drawdowns describe past behaviour, not future safety — both funds carry the market risk of their category.

Can I invest in both Aditya Birla Sun Life Credit Risk Fund and Nippon India Credit Risk Fund?

Yes — many investors split a SIP across two funds. If both funds are from the same category, remember they will hold overlapping stocks, so diversification benefits may be smaller than they appear. Check each scheme's portfolio before doubling up within one category.

Returns, volatility and drawdowns are computed from official AMFI NAV history for direct-growth plans and may differ slightly from fund-house factsheets due to date conventions. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. This comparison is for informational purposes only — not investment advice.