BANDHAN Credit Risk Fund vs HDFC Credit Risk Debt Fund - Growth Option
Credit Risk Fund · Direct Plan – Growth · Compared on official AMFI NAV data · NAVs as of 13-Jul-2026
| Metric | BANDHAN Credit Risk Fund | HDFC Credit Risk Debt Fund - Growth Option |
|---|---|---|
| Latest NAV | ₹18.95 | ₹28.05 |
| 1-Year Return | +6.03% | +7.83% |
| 3-Year Return (CAGR) | +7.55% | +8.42% |
| 5-Year Return (CAGR) | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility (1Y, annualised) | 1.1% | 1.2% |
| Max Drawdown | −0.5% | −0.4% |
| Fund House | Bandhan Mutual Fund | HDFC Mutual Fund |
Growth of ₹10,000
If you had invested ₹10,000 in each fund
Embed this chart on your site (free)
Copy this code into your website or blog. It stays up to date automatically.
<iframe src="https://moneydock.in/embed/fund-compare/bandhan-credit-risk-fund-vs-hdfc-credit-risk-debt-fund-growth-option" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;max-width:760px" title="BANDHAN Credit Risk Fund vs HDFC Credit Risk Debt Fund - Growth Option by MoneyDock" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p style="font-size:12px">Powered by <a href="https://moneydock.in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MoneyDock</a></p>
See the embed documentation for all widgets, sizing options and usage terms.
BANDHAN Credit Risk Fund vs HDFC Credit Risk Debt Fund - Growth Option: which is better?
BANDHAN Credit Risk Fund and HDFC Credit Risk Debt Fund - Growth Option are both credit risk fund mutual funds (direct plan, growth option). This comparison uses each fund's official AMFI NAV history — the same daily data the fund houses publish — to compare returns, volatility and drawdowns side by side.
On 3-year returns (annualised), HDFC Credit Risk Debt Fund - Growth Option leads with +8.42% against +7.55% — a gap of about 0.88 percentage points per year over that period.
BANDHAN Credit Risk Fund has been the steadier fund over the past year, with annualised volatility of 1.1% versus 1.2%. Looking at worst falls, BANDHAN Credit Risk Fund's deepest drawdown in the stored history is −0.5% against −0.4% for HDFC Credit Risk Debt Fund - Growth Option.
Which fund suits you depends on your horizon and appetite for swings: the higher-return fund is only the better pick if you can hold through its rougher months. Use the ₹10,000 growth chart above to see how each fund actually behaved through market cycles, and consider consulting a SEBI-registered adviser before investing. This comparison is informational, not investment advice.
Key takeaways
- HDFC Credit Risk Debt Fund - Growth Option has delivered higher 3-year returns (+8.42% vs +7.55%).
- BANDHAN Credit Risk Fund has shown lower volatility over the trailing year.
- HDFC Credit Risk Debt Fund - Growth Option has had the shallower maximum drawdown (−0.4%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which fund has given higher returns — BANDHAN Credit Risk Fund or HDFC Credit Risk Debt Fund - Growth Option?
Over the past 3 year period, HDFC Credit Risk Debt Fund - Growth Option has delivered higher returns: +8.42% versus +7.55% annualised. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which fund is less risky — BANDHAN Credit Risk Fund or HDFC Credit Risk Debt Fund - Growth Option?
Based on the trailing year, BANDHAN Credit Risk Fund has shown lower day-to-day volatility (BANDHAN Credit Risk Fund: 1.1%, HDFC Credit Risk Debt Fund - Growth Option: 1.2% annualised). Volatility and drawdowns describe past behaviour, not future safety — both funds carry the market risk of their category.
Can I invest in both BANDHAN Credit Risk Fund and HDFC Credit Risk Debt Fund - Growth Option?
Yes — many investors split a SIP across two funds. If both funds are from the same category, remember they will hold overlapping stocks, so diversification benefits may be smaller than they appear. Check each scheme's portfolio before doubling up within one category.
More Credit Risk Fund comparisons
Returns, volatility and drawdowns are computed from official AMFI NAV history for direct-growth plans and may differ slightly from fund-house factsheets due to date conventions. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. This comparison is for informational purposes only — not investment advice.