MoneyDock

Bandhan US Treasury Bond 0-1 year specific Debt Passive FOF vs Edelweiss ASEAN Equity Off-shore Fund

FoF Overseas · Direct Plan – Growth · Compared on official AMFI NAV data · NAVs as of 30-Oct-2026

MetricBandhan US Treasury Bond 0-1 year specific Debt Passive FOFEdelweiss ASEAN Equity Off-shore Fund
Latest NAV₹13.48₹38.62
1-Year Return+13.64%+11.53%
3-Year Return (CAGR)+10.03%+12.06%
5-Year Return (CAGR)N/AN/A
Volatility (1Y, annualised)5.2%16.9%
Max Drawdown−3.4%−16.3%
Fund HouseBandhan Mutual FundEdelweiss Mutual Fund

Growth of ₹10,000

If you had invested ₹10,000 in each fund

Embed this chart on your site (free)

Copy this code into your website or blog. It stays up to date automatically.

<iframe src="https://moneydock.in/embed/fund-compare/bandhan-us-treasury-bond-0-1-year-specific-debt-passive-fof-vs-edelweiss-asean-equity-off-shore-fund" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;max-width:760px" title="Bandhan US Treasury Bond 0-1 year specific Debt Passive FOF vs Edelweiss ASEAN Equity Off-shore Fund by MoneyDock" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:12px">Powered by <a href="https://moneydock.in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MoneyDock</a></p>

See the embed documentation for all widgets, sizing options and usage terms.

Bandhan US Treasury Bond 0-1 year specific Debt Passive FOF vs Edelweiss ASEAN Equity Off-shore Fund: which is better?

Bandhan US Treasury Bond 0-1 year specific Debt Passive FOF and Edelweiss ASEAN Equity Off-shore Fund are both fof overseas mutual funds (direct plan, growth option). This comparison uses each fund's official AMFI NAV history — the same daily data the fund houses publish — to compare returns, volatility and drawdowns side by side.

On 3-year returns (annualised), Edelweiss ASEAN Equity Off-shore Fund leads with +12.06% against +10.03% — a gap of about 2.03 percentage points per year over that period.

Bandhan US Treasury Bond 0-1 year specific Debt Passive FOF has been the steadier fund over the past year, with annualised volatility of 5.2% versus 16.9%. Looking at worst falls, Bandhan US Treasury Bond 0-1 year specific Debt Passive FOF's deepest drawdown in the stored history is −3.4% against −16.3% for Edelweiss ASEAN Equity Off-shore Fund.

Which fund suits you depends on your horizon and appetite for swings: the higher-return fund is only the better pick if you can hold through its rougher months. Use the ₹10,000 growth chart above to see how each fund actually behaved through market cycles, and consider consulting a SEBI-registered adviser before investing. This comparison is informational, not investment advice.

Key takeaways

  • Edelweiss ASEAN Equity Off-shore Fund has delivered higher 3-year returns (+12.06% vs +10.03%).
  • Bandhan US Treasury Bond 0-1 year specific Debt Passive FOF has shown lower volatility over the trailing year.
  • Bandhan US Treasury Bond 0-1 year specific Debt Passive FOF has had the shallower maximum drawdown (−3.4%).

Frequently Asked Questions

Which fund has given higher returns — Bandhan US Treasury Bond 0-1 year specific Debt Passive FOF or Edelweiss ASEAN Equity Off-shore Fund?

Over the past 3 year period, Edelweiss ASEAN Equity Off-shore Fund has delivered higher returns: +12.06% versus +10.03% annualised. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which fund is less risky — Bandhan US Treasury Bond 0-1 year specific Debt Passive FOF or Edelweiss ASEAN Equity Off-shore Fund?

Based on the trailing year, Bandhan US Treasury Bond 0-1 year specific Debt Passive FOF has shown lower day-to-day volatility (Bandhan US Treasury Bond 0-1 year specific Debt Passive FOF: 5.2%, Edelweiss ASEAN Equity Off-shore Fund: 16.9% annualised). Volatility and drawdowns describe past behaviour, not future safety — both funds carry the market risk of their category.

Can I invest in both Bandhan US Treasury Bond 0-1 year specific Debt Passive FOF and Edelweiss ASEAN Equity Off-shore Fund?

Yes — many investors split a SIP across two funds. If both funds are from the same category, remember they will hold overlapping stocks, so diversification benefits may be smaller than they appear. Check each scheme's portfolio before doubling up within one category.

Returns, volatility and drawdowns are computed from official AMFI NAV history for direct-growth plans and may differ slightly from fund-house factsheets due to date conventions. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. This comparison is for informational purposes only — not investment advice.