Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional vs Nippon India Liquid Fund
Liquid Fund · Direct Plan – Growth · Compared on official AMFI NAV data · NAVs as of 13-Jul-2026
| Metric | Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional | Nippon India Liquid Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Latest NAV | ₹4,226.76 | ₹6,883.32 |
| 1-Year Return | +4.64% | +4.65% |
| 3-Year Return (CAGR) | +4.68% | +4.67% |
| 5-Year Return (CAGR) | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility (1Y, annualised) | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| Max Drawdown | −0.0% | −0.0% |
| Fund House | Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund | Nippon India Mutual Fund |
Growth of ₹10,000
If you had invested ₹10,000 in each fund
Embed this chart on your site (free)
Copy this code into your website or blog. It stays up to date automatically.
<iframe src="https://moneydock.in/embed/fund-compare/franklin-india-liquid-fund-super-institutional-vs-nippon-india-liquid-fund" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;max-width:760px" title="Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional vs Nippon India Liquid Fund by MoneyDock" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p style="font-size:12px">Powered by <a href="https://moneydock.in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MoneyDock</a></p>
See the embed documentation for all widgets, sizing options and usage terms.
Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional vs Nippon India Liquid Fund: which is better?
Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional and Nippon India Liquid Fund are both liquid fund mutual funds (direct plan, growth option). This comparison uses each fund's official AMFI NAV history — the same daily data the fund houses publish — to compare returns, volatility and drawdowns side by side.
On 3-year returns (annualised), Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional leads with +4.68% against +4.67% — a gap of about 0.02 percentage points per year over that period.
Nippon India Liquid Fund has been the steadier fund over the past year, with annualised volatility of 0.3% versus 0.3%. Looking at worst falls, Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional's deepest drawdown in the stored history is −0.0% against −0.0% for Nippon India Liquid Fund.
Which fund suits you depends on your horizon and appetite for swings: the higher-return fund is only the better pick if you can hold through its rougher months. Use the ₹10,000 growth chart above to see how each fund actually behaved through market cycles, and consider consulting a SEBI-registered adviser before investing. This comparison is informational, not investment advice.
Key takeaways
- Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional has delivered higher 3-year returns (+4.68% vs +4.67%).
- Nippon India Liquid Fund has shown lower volatility over the trailing year.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which fund has given higher returns — Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional or Nippon India Liquid Fund?
Over the past 3 year period, Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional has delivered higher returns: +4.68% versus +4.67% annualised. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which fund is less risky — Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional or Nippon India Liquid Fund?
Based on the trailing year, Nippon India Liquid Fund has shown lower day-to-day volatility (Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional: 0.3%, Nippon India Liquid Fund: 0.3% annualised). Volatility and drawdowns describe past behaviour, not future safety — both funds carry the market risk of their category.
Can I invest in both Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional and Nippon India Liquid Fund?
Yes — many investors split a SIP across two funds. If both funds are from the same category, remember they will hold overlapping stocks, so diversification benefits may be smaller than they appear. Check each scheme's portfolio before doubling up within one category.
More Liquid Fund comparisons
Returns, volatility and drawdowns are computed from official AMFI NAV history for direct-growth plans and may differ slightly from fund-house factsheets due to date conventions. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. This comparison is for informational purposes only — not investment advice.