MoneyDock

Navi Aggressive Hybrid Fund vs quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option

Aggressive Hybrid Fund · Direct Plan – Growth · Compared on official AMFI NAV data · NAVs as of 13-Jul-2026

MetricNavi Aggressive Hybrid Fundquant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option
Latest NAV₹25.43₹519.56
1-Year Return+7.69%+11.15%
3-Year Return (CAGR)+14.64%+16.88%
5-Year Return (CAGR)N/AN/A
Volatility (1Y, annualised)12.2%12.5%
Max Drawdown−12.5%−18.6%
Fund HouseNavi Mutual Fundquant Mutual Fund

Growth of ₹10,000

If you had invested ₹10,000 in each fund

Embed this chart on your site (free)

Copy this code into your website or blog. It stays up to date automatically.

<iframe src="https://moneydock.in/embed/fund-compare/navi-aggressive-hybrid-fund-vs-quant-aggressive-hybrid-fund-growth-option" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;max-width:760px" title="Navi Aggressive Hybrid Fund vs quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option by MoneyDock" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:12px">Powered by <a href="https://moneydock.in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MoneyDock</a></p>

See the embed documentation for all widgets, sizing options and usage terms.

Navi Aggressive Hybrid Fund vs quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option: which is better?

Navi Aggressive Hybrid Fund and quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option are both aggressive hybrid fund mutual funds (direct plan, growth option). This comparison uses each fund's official AMFI NAV history — the same daily data the fund houses publish — to compare returns, volatility and drawdowns side by side.

On 3-year returns (annualised), quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option leads with +16.88% against +14.64% — a gap of about 2.24 percentage points per year over that period.

Navi Aggressive Hybrid Fund has been the steadier fund over the past year, with annualised volatility of 12.2% versus 12.5%. Looking at worst falls, Navi Aggressive Hybrid Fund's deepest drawdown in the stored history is −12.5% against −18.6% for quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option.

Which fund suits you depends on your horizon and appetite for swings: the higher-return fund is only the better pick if you can hold through its rougher months. Use the ₹10,000 growth chart above to see how each fund actually behaved through market cycles, and consider consulting a SEBI-registered adviser before investing. This comparison is informational, not investment advice.

Key takeaways

  • quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option has delivered higher 3-year returns (+16.88% vs +14.64%).
  • Navi Aggressive Hybrid Fund has shown lower volatility over the trailing year.
  • Navi Aggressive Hybrid Fund has had the shallower maximum drawdown (−12.5%).

Frequently Asked Questions

Which fund has given higher returns — Navi Aggressive Hybrid Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option?

Over the past 3 year period, quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option has delivered higher returns: +16.88% versus +14.64% annualised. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which fund is less risky — Navi Aggressive Hybrid Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option?

Based on the trailing year, Navi Aggressive Hybrid Fund has shown lower day-to-day volatility (Navi Aggressive Hybrid Fund: 12.2%, quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option: 12.5% annualised). Volatility and drawdowns describe past behaviour, not future safety — both funds carry the market risk of their category.

Can I invest in both Navi Aggressive Hybrid Fund and quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option?

Yes — many investors split a SIP across two funds. If both funds are from the same category, remember they will hold overlapping stocks, so diversification benefits may be smaller than they appear. Check each scheme's portfolio before doubling up within one category.

Returns, volatility and drawdowns are computed from official AMFI NAV history for direct-growth plans and may differ slightly from fund-house factsheets due to date conventions. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. This comparison is for informational purposes only — not investment advice.