quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option vs UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund
Aggressive Hybrid Fund · Direct Plan – Growth · Compared on official AMFI NAV data · NAVs as of 10-Jul-2026
| Metric | quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option | UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Latest NAV | ₹517.87 | ₹443.25 |
| 1-Year Return | +9.24% | -0.17% |
| 3-Year Return (CAGR) | +16.27% | +13.87% |
| 5-Year Return (CAGR) | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility (1Y, annualised) | 12.5% | 9.6% |
| Max Drawdown | −18.6% | −12.0% |
| Fund House | quant Mutual Fund | UTI Mutual Fund |
Growth of ₹10,000
If you had invested ₹10,000 in each fund
Embed this chart on your site (free)
Copy this code into your website or blog. It stays up to date automatically.
<iframe src="https://moneydock.in/embed/fund-compare/quant-aggressive-hybrid-fund-growth-option-vs-uti-aggressive-hybrid-fund" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;max-width:760px" title="quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option vs UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund by MoneyDock" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p style="font-size:12px">Powered by <a href="https://moneydock.in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MoneyDock</a></p>
See the embed documentation for all widgets, sizing options and usage terms.
quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option vs UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund: which is better?
quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option and UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund are both aggressive hybrid fund mutual funds (direct plan, growth option). This comparison uses each fund's official AMFI NAV history — the same daily data the fund houses publish — to compare returns, volatility and drawdowns side by side.
On 3-year returns (annualised), quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option leads with +16.27% against +13.87% — a gap of about 2.40 percentage points per year over that period.
UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund has been the steadier fund over the past year, with annualised volatility of 9.6% versus 12.5%. Looking at worst falls, quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option's deepest drawdown in the stored history is −18.6% against −12.0% for UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund.
Which fund suits you depends on your horizon and appetite for swings: the higher-return fund is only the better pick if you can hold through its rougher months. Use the ₹10,000 growth chart above to see how each fund actually behaved through market cycles, and consider consulting a SEBI-registered adviser before investing. This comparison is informational, not investment advice.
Key takeaways
- quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option has delivered higher 3-year returns (+16.27% vs +13.87%).
- UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund has shown lower volatility over the trailing year.
- UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund has had the shallower maximum drawdown (−12.0%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which fund has given higher returns — quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option or UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
Over the past 3 year period, quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option has delivered higher returns: +16.27% versus +13.87% annualised. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which fund is less risky — quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option or UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
Based on the trailing year, UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund has shown lower day-to-day volatility (quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option: 12.5%, UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund: 9.6% annualised). Volatility and drawdowns describe past behaviour, not future safety — both funds carry the market risk of their category.
Can I invest in both quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option and UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
Yes — many investors split a SIP across two funds. If both funds are from the same category, remember they will hold overlapping stocks, so diversification benefits may be smaller than they appear. Check each scheme's portfolio before doubling up within one category.
More Aggressive Hybrid Fund comparisons
Returns, volatility and drawdowns are computed from official AMFI NAV history for direct-growth plans and may differ slightly from fund-house factsheets due to date conventions. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. This comparison is for informational purposes only — not investment advice.