Sundaram Liquid Fund (Formerly Known as Principal Cash Management Fund) vs Tata Liquid Fund
Liquid Fund · Direct Plan – Growth · Compared on official AMFI NAV data · NAVs as of 13-Jul-2026
| Metric | Sundaram Liquid Fund (Formerly Known as Principal Cash Management Fund) | Tata Liquid Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Latest NAV | ₹2,483.96 | ₹4,437.73 |
| 1-Year Return | +4.61% | +4.62% |
| 3-Year Return (CAGR) | +4.67% | +4.67% |
| 5-Year Return (CAGR) | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility (1Y, annualised) | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Max Drawdown | −0.0% | −0.0% |
| Fund House | Sundaram Mutual Fund | Tata Mutual Fund |
Growth of ₹10,000
If you had invested ₹10,000 in each fund
Embed this chart on your site (free)
Copy this code into your website or blog. It stays up to date automatically.
<iframe src="https://moneydock.in/embed/fund-compare/sundaram-liquid-fund-formerly-known-as-principal-cash-management-fund-vs-tata-liquid-fund" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;max-width:760px" title="Sundaram Liquid Fund (Formerly Known as Principal Cash Management Fund) vs Tata Liquid Fund by MoneyDock" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p style="font-size:12px">Powered by <a href="https://moneydock.in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MoneyDock</a></p>
See the embed documentation for all widgets, sizing options and usage terms.
Sundaram Liquid Fund (Formerly Known as Principal Cash Management Fund) vs Tata Liquid Fund: which is better?
Sundaram Liquid Fund (Formerly Known as Principal Cash Management Fund) and Tata Liquid Fund are both liquid fund mutual funds (direct plan, growth option). This comparison uses each fund's official AMFI NAV history — the same daily data the fund houses publish — to compare returns, volatility and drawdowns side by side.
On 3-year returns (annualised) the two funds are effectively neck and neck: Sundaram Liquid Fund (Formerly Known as Principal Cash Management Fund) at +4.67% versus Tata Liquid Fund at +4.67%.
Both funds have shown similar volatility over the past year (about 0.2%). Looking at worst falls, Sundaram Liquid Fund (Formerly Known as Principal Cash Management Fund)'s deepest drawdown in the stored history is −0.0% against −0.0% for Tata Liquid Fund.
Which fund suits you depends on your horizon and appetite for swings: the higher-return fund is only the better pick if you can hold through its rougher months. Use the ₹10,000 growth chart above to see how each fund actually behaved through market cycles, and consider consulting a SEBI-registered adviser before investing. This comparison is informational, not investment advice.
Key takeaways
- 3-year returns are virtually identical (+4.67% vs +4.67%).
- Tata Liquid Fund has had the shallower maximum drawdown (−0.0%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which fund has given higher returns — Sundaram Liquid Fund (Formerly Known as Principal Cash Management Fund) or Tata Liquid Fund?
Over the past 3 year period their returns are almost identical: Sundaram Liquid Fund (Formerly Known as Principal Cash Management Fund) +4.67% and Tata Liquid Fund +4.67% annualised. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which fund is less risky — Sundaram Liquid Fund (Formerly Known as Principal Cash Management Fund) or Tata Liquid Fund?
Based on the trailing year, neither fund clearly separates on volatility (Sundaram Liquid Fund (Formerly Known as Principal Cash Management Fund): 0.2%, Tata Liquid Fund: 0.2% annualised). Volatility and drawdowns describe past behaviour, not future safety — both funds carry the market risk of their category.
Can I invest in both Sundaram Liquid Fund (Formerly Known as Principal Cash Management Fund) and Tata Liquid Fund?
Yes — many investors split a SIP across two funds. If both funds are from the same category, remember they will hold overlapping stocks, so diversification benefits may be smaller than they appear. Check each scheme's portfolio before doubling up within one category.
More Liquid Fund comparisons
Returns, volatility and drawdowns are computed from official AMFI NAV history for direct-growth plans and may differ slightly from fund-house factsheets due to date conventions. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. This comparison is for informational purposes only — not investment advice.