UTI Annual Interval Fund - I vs UTI Fixed Term Income Fund Series XXXVI - I (1574 Days)
IDF · Direct Plan – Growth · Compared on official AMFI NAV data · NAVs as of 13-Jul-2026
| Metric | UTI Annual Interval Fund - I | UTI Fixed Term Income Fund Series XXXVI - I (1574 Days) |
|---|---|---|
| Latest NAV | ₹36.69 | ₹12.95 |
| 1-Year Return | +5.53% | +6.26% |
| 3-Year Return (CAGR) | +6.49% | +7.70% |
| 5-Year Return (CAGR) | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility (1Y, annualised) | 0.3% | 0.8% |
| Max Drawdown | −0.0% | −0.6% |
| Fund House | UTI Mutual Fund | UTI Mutual Fund |
Growth of ₹10,000
If you had invested ₹10,000 in each fund
Embed this chart on your site (free)
Copy this code into your website or blog. It stays up to date automatically.
<iframe src="https://moneydock.in/embed/fund-compare/uti-annual-interval-fund-i-vs-uti-fixed-term-income-fund-series-xxxvi-i-1574-days" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;max-width:760px" title="UTI Annual Interval Fund - I vs UTI Fixed Term Income Fund Series XXXVI - I (1574 Days) by MoneyDock" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p style="font-size:12px">Powered by <a href="https://moneydock.in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MoneyDock</a></p>
See the embed documentation for all widgets, sizing options and usage terms.
UTI Annual Interval Fund - I vs UTI Fixed Term Income Fund Series XXXVI - I (1574 Days): which is better?
UTI Annual Interval Fund - I and UTI Fixed Term Income Fund Series XXXVI - I (1574 Days) are both idf mutual funds (direct plan, growth option). This comparison uses each fund's official AMFI NAV history — the same daily data the fund houses publish — to compare returns, volatility and drawdowns side by side.
On 3-year returns (annualised), UTI Fixed Term Income Fund Series XXXVI - I (1574 Days) leads with +7.70% against +6.49% — a gap of about 1.20 percentage points per year over that period.
UTI Annual Interval Fund - I has been the steadier fund over the past year, with annualised volatility of 0.3% versus 0.8%. Looking at worst falls, UTI Annual Interval Fund - I's deepest drawdown in the stored history is −0.0% against −0.6% for UTI Fixed Term Income Fund Series XXXVI - I (1574 Days).
Which fund suits you depends on your horizon and appetite for swings: the higher-return fund is only the better pick if you can hold through its rougher months. Use the ₹10,000 growth chart above to see how each fund actually behaved through market cycles, and consider consulting a SEBI-registered adviser before investing. This comparison is informational, not investment advice.
Key takeaways
- UTI Fixed Term Income Fund Series XXXVI - I (1574 Days) has delivered higher 3-year returns (+7.70% vs +6.49%).
- UTI Annual Interval Fund - I has shown lower volatility over the trailing year.
- UTI Annual Interval Fund - I has had the shallower maximum drawdown (−0.0%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which fund has given higher returns — UTI Annual Interval Fund - I or UTI Fixed Term Income Fund Series XXXVI - I (1574 Days)?
Over the past 3 year period, UTI Fixed Term Income Fund Series XXXVI - I (1574 Days) has delivered higher returns: +7.70% versus +6.49% annualised. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which fund is less risky — UTI Annual Interval Fund - I or UTI Fixed Term Income Fund Series XXXVI - I (1574 Days)?
Based on the trailing year, UTI Annual Interval Fund - I has shown lower day-to-day volatility (UTI Annual Interval Fund - I: 0.3%, UTI Fixed Term Income Fund Series XXXVI - I (1574 Days): 0.8% annualised). Volatility and drawdowns describe past behaviour, not future safety — both funds carry the market risk of their category.
Can I invest in both UTI Annual Interval Fund - I and UTI Fixed Term Income Fund Series XXXVI - I (1574 Days)?
Yes — many investors split a SIP across two funds. If both funds are from the same category, remember they will hold overlapping stocks, so diversification benefits may be smaller than they appear. Check each scheme's portfolio before doubling up within one category.
More IDF comparisons
Returns, volatility and drawdowns are computed from official AMFI NAV history for direct-growth plans and may differ slightly from fund-house factsheets due to date conventions. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. This comparison is for informational purposes only — not investment advice.