MoneyDock

Baroda BNP Paribas Credit Risk Fund vs Kotak Credit Risk Fund - Growth

Credit Risk Fund · Direct Plan – Growth · Compared on official AMFI NAV data · NAVs as of 13-Jul-2026

MetricBaroda BNP Paribas Credit Risk FundKotak Credit Risk Fund - Growth
Latest NAV₹26.27₹35.93
1-Year Return+7.44%+8.32%
3-Year Return (CAGR)+8.63%+8.80%
5-Year Return (CAGR)N/AN/A
Volatility (1Y, annualised)0.9%1.5%
Max Drawdown−0.3%−1.5%
Fund HouseBaroda BNP Paribas Mutual FundKotak Mahindra Mutual Fund

Growth of ₹10,000

If you had invested ₹10,000 in each fund

Embed this chart on your site (free)

Copy this code into your website or blog. It stays up to date automatically.

<iframe src="https://moneydock.in/embed/fund-compare/baroda-bnp-paribas-credit-risk-fund-vs-kotak-credit-risk-fund-growth" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;max-width:760px" title="Baroda BNP Paribas Credit Risk Fund vs Kotak Credit Risk Fund - Growth by MoneyDock" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:12px">Powered by <a href="https://moneydock.in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MoneyDock</a></p>

See the embed documentation for all widgets, sizing options and usage terms.

Baroda BNP Paribas Credit Risk Fund vs Kotak Credit Risk Fund - Growth: which is better?

Baroda BNP Paribas Credit Risk Fund and Kotak Credit Risk Fund - Growth are both credit risk fund mutual funds (direct plan, growth option). This comparison uses each fund's official AMFI NAV history — the same daily data the fund houses publish — to compare returns, volatility and drawdowns side by side.

On 3-year returns (annualised), Kotak Credit Risk Fund - Growth leads with +8.80% against +8.63% — a gap of about 0.17 percentage points per year over that period.

Baroda BNP Paribas Credit Risk Fund has been the steadier fund over the past year, with annualised volatility of 0.9% versus 1.5%. Looking at worst falls, Baroda BNP Paribas Credit Risk Fund's deepest drawdown in the stored history is −0.3% against −1.5% for Kotak Credit Risk Fund - Growth.

Which fund suits you depends on your horizon and appetite for swings: the higher-return fund is only the better pick if you can hold through its rougher months. Use the ₹10,000 growth chart above to see how each fund actually behaved through market cycles, and consider consulting a SEBI-registered adviser before investing. This comparison is informational, not investment advice.

Key takeaways

  • Kotak Credit Risk Fund - Growth has delivered higher 3-year returns (+8.80% vs +8.63%).
  • Baroda BNP Paribas Credit Risk Fund has shown lower volatility over the trailing year.
  • Baroda BNP Paribas Credit Risk Fund has had the shallower maximum drawdown (−0.3%).

Frequently Asked Questions

Which fund has given higher returns — Baroda BNP Paribas Credit Risk Fund or Kotak Credit Risk Fund - Growth?

Over the past 3 year period, Kotak Credit Risk Fund - Growth has delivered higher returns: +8.80% versus +8.63% annualised. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which fund is less risky — Baroda BNP Paribas Credit Risk Fund or Kotak Credit Risk Fund - Growth?

Based on the trailing year, Baroda BNP Paribas Credit Risk Fund has shown lower day-to-day volatility (Baroda BNP Paribas Credit Risk Fund: 0.9%, Kotak Credit Risk Fund - Growth: 1.5% annualised). Volatility and drawdowns describe past behaviour, not future safety — both funds carry the market risk of their category.

Can I invest in both Baroda BNP Paribas Credit Risk Fund and Kotak Credit Risk Fund - Growth?

Yes — many investors split a SIP across two funds. If both funds are from the same category, remember they will hold overlapping stocks, so diversification benefits may be smaller than they appear. Check each scheme's portfolio before doubling up within one category.

Returns, volatility and drawdowns are computed from official AMFI NAV history for direct-growth plans and may differ slightly from fund-house factsheets due to date conventions. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. This comparison is for informational purposes only — not investment advice.